1. OFFICIAL MINUTES
      2. MUSCATINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
      3. MARCH 18, 2009

      OFFICIAL MINUTES
      MUSCATINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
      MARCH 18, 2009
      The Muscatine Historic Preservation Commission (MHPC) met in regular session
      on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 at 5:15 p.m. in the lower level conference room at the
      Muscatine City Hall, 215 Sycamore. Members present included Mary Anne Kessler, Dan
      Clark, Devin Pettit and Jo Ann Carlson. Others present included Maryrose Peterschmidt
      (former MHPC member), Connie Street (Louisa County Historic Preservation
      Commission), Charles Pearson (Iowa Cross-Cultural Association), Dave Armstrong
      (local realtor) and staff assistant Jim Rudisill.
      The commission reviewed the consent agenda, including the distributed meeting
      agenda and the minutes of the regular January 21, 2009 meeting. One correction noted
      was to change the date of the meeting from January 21, 2008 to January 21, 2009.
      There were no other changes to the meeting agenda or the consent agenda.
      Pettit moved to approve the consent agenda with the corrected minutes; Kessler
      seconded; motion passed, all ayes.
      Prior to bringing any of the agenda items up for discussion, Clark introduced
      Charles Pearson of the Iowa Cross-Cultural Association. Pearson said one of his initial
      interests had been investigating black history in Iowa and he had started working in
      Davenport on that issue. While working there however, Pearson said he had become
      aware of Clark and Kent Sissel’s earlier interest with Alexander Clark; and now was
      becoming involved in those efforts himself.
      Pearson also pointed out his organization was not focused on any specific culture,
      but working to show how people of all cultures had impacted the community. He recently
      began looking at the contributions of the strong German influence in Muscatine and
      expected to continue those efforts, he said. Clark thanked Pearson for his work and
      invited him to keep the commission informed on his progress.
      The Certified Local Government (CLG) status at both the city and county level
      was the first discussion item. Clark said during an earlier meeting with city administrator
      AJ Johnson, he had discussed the possibility of attending a city council in-depth meeting
      to update the current council on the goals, objectives and responsibilities of the MHPC.
      Clark said this meeting would likely be scheduled prior to May and include some
      type of PowerPoint presentation. Other commission members were invited to participate
      in developing the presentation and attending the meeting.
      He said Johnson had reminded him during their meeting that the 10-year
      anniversary of the MHPC would occur in 2009, which could create an ideal time to
      present a list of commission accomplishments. It could also provide an opportunity to
      energize the community with a renewed focus on historic preservation, Clark said.
      The commission also discussed the county CLG effort. Rudisill reported no
      Muscatine County officials had contacted him yet concerning any grant proposal for
      restoration work on the old jail or other county historic buildings within the city limits.
      The commission then discussed possible joint training opportunities between the
      Louisa County Historic Preservation Commission (LCHPC) and the Muscatine Historic
      Preservation Commission (MHPC). Connie Street explained she was a new member of
      the LCHPC and was interested in obtaining some type of training that would explain how
      historic preservation commissions operate. However, she had not seen any opportunities
      for such training.

      MHPC Minutes
      February 18, 2009
      Page 2
      She pointed out, and members of the MHPC concurred, that state law requires
      annual training. The LCHPC is a five-member board and Street said she knew at least
      three of the members, including her, had not completed any training.
      MHPC members told Street about the on-line training available through the SHSI
      website. Street said she would investigate that training option.
      Peterschmidt said when she was a new member on the MHPC someone from the
      State Historical Society of Iowa (SHSI) had travelled to Muscatine and provided training.
      She also said private consultant Molly Naumann had provided training.
      Clark said he had recently attended a program on John Brown in West Liberty and
      learned there was interest in that area for historic preservation and similar training. He
      suggested if the LCHPC wanted to organize a training event the members of the MHPC
      would be happy to attend.
      Several commissioners recalled that SHSI CLG Coordinator Paula Mohr had
      reported last year that the SHSI no longer did individual training programs, but did
      conduct quarterly programs around the state. Mohr had suggested a joint program that
      could be conducted as one of the quarterly programs would be feasible.
      Kessler then moved that the MHPC cooperate with the LCHPC to hold a joint
      training program, subject to SHSI agreeing to provide the training as part of its quarterly
      training program, at a site and date to be determined; Carlson seconded; motion passed,
      all ayes.
      Carlson agreed to work with Street to contact Mohr and coordinate the effort.
      The commission also discussed with Street the possibility of conducting a joint
      tour of historic places in the two-county area. All representatives agreed to continue that
      discussion. Street also mentioned items from the archaeological dig near Oakville might
      eventually be displayed at the Louisa County Historical Museum, but that was pending.
      The commission next discussed 1402 Mulberry.
      Clark described the February meeting of the Muscatine Art Center Board of
      Directors he had attended. He explained the first part is normally provided for citizen
      input, but he had remained afterwards for the rest of the meeting.
      He explained that during a portion of the later meeting, the directors began
      discussing issues that reminded him of discussions during the MHPC meetings. The city
      council had just cut $30,000 from the Art Center budget shortly before the directors met
      and Clark said they were concerned that few in the community knew who they were or
      what they were doing.
      They had also observed that of the current council members, they could only
      recall two who had been to the museum. Clark said after hearing the discussion, he
      realized the art center board and the MHPC shared many of the same concerns and
      problems. That caused him to adopt a less confrontational approach on the various
      options developed by the board.
      Clark said he was able to obtain a commitment that a director, whom he believed
      would be Mark Huddleston, a member of the board’s buildings and grounds committee,
      would attend the next MHPC meeting. Clark indicated he was surprised and disappointed
      no one came.

      MHPC Minutes
      March 18, 2009
      Page 3
      Clark said the board also notified him the 180-day period for complying with one
      of the three options had started following the board’s vote on offering the options. He
      said there did appear to be some confusion by board members on how any agreement
      would be composed and also the involvement of the city council in any decisions. When
      the discussion shifted to the potential costs associated with moving the house, director
      Mike Knott offered to contact Goodwin Moving, Washington, for information.
      Clark said he talked with Knott about Knott’s contact with Goodwin and learned
      from Knott that Goodwin could not provide an initial cost estimate without driving the
      move route. Clark said Knott had reported that Goodwin said the cost for moving
      overhead lines could vary from $750 to $8000, depending on their size and other issues.
      Clark had reported earlier that he had been told by Sissel that overhead lines cost around
      $1000 to move.
      Goodwin had told Knott that just jacking a house up and setting it back down on a
      foundation would cost between $28,000 and $32,000. Knott also reported Steve Goodwin
      had told him persons interested in moving a house needed to purchase a lot before
      determining the cost of moving the house.
      Clark said he did talk with Laura Liegois, director of the Muscatine Transfer
      Station, to obtain information on tipping fees for demolition debris and had also learned
      about two-thirds of the cost of demolition was for tipping fees. He said Knott had
      reported the estimated demolition cost provided to the board by Jerry Sulzberger was
      around $30,000. Pettit said there would be an increase in the tipping fees after July 1.
      Pettit also said when the draft 2009-13 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) plan
      had been presented to the Muscatine Planning and Zoning Commission in December, it
      included $130,000 for acquisition and $45,000 for demolition of 1402 Mulberry.
      Clark also said he had told the art center board about the interest in the house by
      the Jayne descendants and their desire to come to Muscatine later this year to see the
      house. He said he asked if the 180-day period could be extended to accommodate their
      schedule and was told by Huddleston the board wanted the building gone during this
      construction season.
      Armstrong then said he had looked at several lots in the area and provided data,
      such as current assessed value, size, ownership and other information, to the commission.
      The commission discussed some of the features of each and their suitability as a potential
      house site.
      After reviewing the list, the commission again questioned why the art center was
      seeking demolition of the house and what its ultimate goal was for the area. The members
      agreed they still were unclear why the art center wanted to clear the area. Suggestions
      ranged from green space to parking to building expansion, but Clark said there had not
      been any clear indication from the board.
      Armstrong said the next step might be to get an accurate estimate for moving the
      house. Clark agreed that could be part of a commission decision to accept one of the
      board’s options, but he also said Michael Maharry (Friends of Muscatine Historic
      Preservation) believed the commission should push back on the art center for not
      considering other options that could save the house.
      Kessler said regardless of what direction the commission moved, she did not feel
      the 180 days should have started until the costs for moving the building had been
      determined. Peterschmidt said the art center should be asked to provide a greater share of
      those costs than the $5000 it has offered. The consensus supported that suggestion.

      MHPC Minutes
      March 18, 2009
      Page 4
      Clark said he would attend the next meeting of the art board on March 19 and
      would request an increase in its initial $5000 contribution, possibly up to $45,000. He
      also invited any other commission members to attend.
      Clark also said he would attend the next council meeting to discuss the city’s
      demolition list and potential demolitions of two buildings.
      The commission then discussed the possible designation of an Alexander Clark
      local historic district. Clark reported on several upcoming meetings or activities involving
      Clark or contemporary historic events associated with him. These included meeting with
      Musser Public Library Director Pam Collins and Photographic Archivist Sheila Chaudoin
      to discuss the district effort. Clark also reported that on April 23, James Hill, U.S. Park
      Service, would be presenting a program on the Underground Railroad in Anamosa and
      again on April 26 in Tipton.
      Clark also reported that Iowa Governor Chet Culver is planning to proclaim
      Alexander Clark an outstanding Iowan. The Old Creamery Theater is also presenting a
      play that would focus on three important civil rights court cases in Iowa, including an
      1868 Iowa Supreme Court case in which Clark’s daughter Susan won the right to attend
      the public school of her choice in Muscatine.
      The commission next discussed the upcoming Historic Preservation Month
      activities. Peterschmidt mentioned Barbara Sabbath as a possible Stewardship Award
      recipient for her work with the historic district. Carlson also agreed to contact 1
      st
      National
      Bank to verify its public room had been reserved for the May 9 awards ceremony.
      Several miscellaneous reports and general comments were then presented.
      Clark asked about the walking tour that had been discussed during past meetings.
      Pettit reminded him the information was being compiled by Tom and Sharon Savage
      using the historical information provided by the surveys.
      Carlson said she had some material at one time and would try and relocate it.
      Clark also announced his interest in the city’s plans to upgrade and repair
      deteriorating walls in the alley behind River’s Edge Gallery and parking lot walls
      between Pro Hair and the gallery. The walls are scheduled to be discussed by the city
      council at the next meeting. Clark said he would also discuss these walls with the council
      when he meets with it regarding the demolition list and other issues. Clark said there are
      a variety of options for the lot.
      Clark also provided Pettit with a copy of the National Trust publication,
      “Protecting Potential Landmarks Through Demolition Review,” and asked him to read it
      and provide the commission with comments.
      Pettit presented a report on the Hershey Avenue sewer project and the
      straightening of Mississippi Drive.
      The next meeting of the commission will be held Wednesday, April 15.
      The commission then adjourned at approximately 7:10 p.m.
      Respectfully submitted,
      __________________________
      Chair

      Back to top